この質問に回答する

ディズニープリンセス 質問

What do あなた guys have to say about this?

Steve Hulett wrote:
While wandering the halls of the hat building yesterday, I chanced on one of the traditional animators working there. He said:

"We're developing a bunch of different projects to 表示する John Lasseter. It's a complicated process. We pitch to a development group, they tell us which ones they like, then tell us that people who're pitching need to develop three pitches for John, since he likes artists 表示中 him three things. And when we do pitch, it's made clear to us that the stories aren't necessarily for a hand-drawn project. When we've brought it up with John Lasseter, he's shied away from committing to a hand-drawn feature..."

This is a turn-around from a few years ago, when the idea was to have hand-drawn features created in Burbank, and the CG features produced at Emeryville.

My thought is: John Lasseter is a smart man. He likes hand-drawn but he recognizes they way the wind is blowing. The Princess and the Frog grossed $300 million globally; 塔の上のラプンツェル grossed twice that. When the gap is so wide, it's an easy corporate decision to say: "We're going with CGI."

Ron Clements and John Musker are developing a hand-drawn feature that, if what I've been shown holds up, will look one hell of a lot different from 表示する White. The scuttlebutt I've heard indicates that Mr. Lasseter isn't as keen on greenlighting hand-drawn epics as he was a few years ago. But who inside Diz Co. could blame him? もっと見る than overseeing hand-drawn animation, John Lasseter wants to win. And he's probably made the judgment that creating hand-drawn features isn't a winning corporate strategy.

Even so, I was disheartened to read this from Mr. Kousac down below:

"Thankfully, no "hand drawn" カートゥーン are in the work at ディズニー for the foreseeable future. Looking フォワード, 前進, 楽しみにして to seeing the ディズニー artists take hold of their new digital tools."

Sorry, Mr. Kousac. あなた can be as glad as あなた like ディズニー hasn't got any hand-drawn features on its "to do" list. But I think
 What do あなた guys have to say about this?
*
I'm devastated and speechless. *Silence.* Okay, I found words. The world is ending! Hnad drawn アニメーション is so beautiful and classic. Cgi is wonderful in it's own way, but I would be blown away to see another hand drawn movie. :'( Sorry for my insane emotional state.
MalloMar posted 1年以上前
 ARIEL-RAPUNZEL posted 1年以上前
next question »

ディズニープリンセス 回答

DsnyPrincess said:
That makes me so upset personally I prefer the hand drawn over the CGI. I think their crazy!
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
chesire said:
:(
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
hajirah4 said:
First of all, あなた jimmy-jacking idiots,(this being pointed to the animators that specifically think that 塔の上のラプンツェル grossed もっと見る because it was CGI, which in my perspective, doesn't make sense.) need to learn that kids don't care. Do あなた know that they don't even know that CGI is アニメーション except it's made によって computer technology,to get it done a bit faster. Do y あなた even know that they don't care about the title? Even if a boy at first thought,

''Oh this movie is probably about a lame princess キス a frog, I won't watch it!",

he would look at the hilarity and awesome moments with Lottie and want to watch it. Just because kids are senseless that doesn't mean that they're dumb. I hate Flo Rida but that doesn't mean that I hate Wreck -it- Ralph. If kids like the trailer (plot) then they'll watch it. SImple as that.

Second, reasons that P.A.T.F (not the Pittsburg AIDS Task Force, Tiana's movie.) might have gotten such low money on the box office may have been either because the trailer was horrible and あなた didn't explain the plot properly so they didn't watch it, あなた didn't put the movie in もっと見る large countries like for e.x.p: Greece, または the critiques hated it. People treat critiques as if it's either a coupon so あなた can save money from movie tickets, または they treat it like they're Channing Tatum. Why did they hate it? Maybe because of the some-what bad 愛 chemistry または it's some racist garbage. I personally hate the 愛 chemistry. They fell in 愛 through dancing and 歌う in a green pond.
Literally. Then the 次 romance is Naveen as a frog giving a ring to Tiana. Please. That had no chemistry at all. Atleast put in another problem. Even though I may be wrong about the chemistry, but I can't be wrong about my reasons of why P.A.T.F. grossed a bit low. 塔の上のラプンツェル had Flynn and Rapunzel facing もっと見る problems, she even saved a LIFE. All this chemistry compared to Tangled, just doesn't seem right. However, I still 愛 P.A.T.F just A LITTLE もっと見る than Tangled.

And THAT is my rant on them. To make it short, 塔の上のラプンツェル wasn't higher because it was CGI. It was because of the full plot.
select as best answer
 First of all, あなた jimmy-jacking idiots,(this being pointed to the animators that specifically think that 塔の上のラプンツェル grossed もっと見る because it was CGI, which in my perspective, doesn't make sense.) need to learn that kids don't care. Do あなた know that they don't even know that CGI is アニメーション except it's made によって computer technology,to get it done a bit faster. Do y あなた even know that they don't care about the title? Even if a boy at first thought, ''Oh this movie is probably about a lame princess キス a frog, I won't watch it!", he would look at the hilarity and awesome moments with Lottie and want to watch it. Just because kids are senseless that doesn't mean that they're dumb. I hate Flo Rida but that doesn't mean that I hate Wreck -it- Ralph. If kids like the trailer (plot) then they'll watch it. SImple as that. Second, reasons that P.A.T.F (not the Pittsburg AIDS Task Force, Tiana's movie.) might have gotten such low money on the box office may have been either because the trailer was horrible and あなた didn't explain the plot properly so they didn't watch it, あなた didn't put the movie in もっと見る large countries like for e.x.p: Greece, または the critiques hated it. People treat critiques as if it's either a coupon so あなた can save money from movie tickets, または they treat it like they're Channing Tatum. Why did they hate it? Maybe because of the some-what bad 愛 chemistry または it's some racist garbage. I personally hate the 愛 chemistry. They fell in 愛 through dancing and 歌う in a green pond. Literally. Then the 次 romance is Naveen as a frog giving a ring to Tiana. Please. That had no chemistry at all. Atleast put in another problem. Even though I may be wrong about the chemistry, but I can't be wrong about my reasons of why P.A.T.F. grossed a bit low. 塔の上のラプンツェル had Flynn and Rapunzel facing もっと見る problems, she even saved a LIFE. All this chemistry compared to Tangled, just doesn't seem right. However, I still 愛 P.A.T.F just A LITTLE もっと見る than Tangled. And THAT is my rant on them. To make it short, 塔の上のラプンツェル wasn't higher because it was CGI. It was because of the full plot.
posted 1年以上前 
*
First of all あなた need to control your bad temper.
ARIEL-RAPUNZEL posted 1年以上前
*
I'm not the only one who LOVES Tiana and thinks Princess and the frog is slightly better than Tangled?
MalloMar posted 1年以上前
*
@MalloMar, yes, あなた aren't :)
hajirah4 posted 1年以上前
fahmad27 said:
Those people at DIsney are being such wimps! 塔の上のラプンツェル did better because it had a better plot and better romance; NOT because it was CGI! Please keep hand-drawn アニメーション alive at Disney!!! Hand-drawn アニメーション has something that CGI doesn't have: beautiful humans!

Seriously, I can't stand watching CGI 映画 (especially in the late 90s and beyond) because all the human characters look (in the hyena's voices) "UUUUU-GLY!" They look hideous; they look like robots または those creepy ドール that use to scare my sister's childhood friend!
Even back in the 90s I had problem with this. When Toy Story 2 came out, my brother complained that Al and Andy's mom are the only ones that actually look human. Young Andy and Baby Molly look like robots.
Every human in シュレック または any piece によって Dreamworks look scary as heck!

The only CGI movie that have attractive-looking human characters are Despicable Me, the Incredibles, Ratatouille, Brave, Toy Story 3, Tangled, and maybe Bolt. I haven't seen Wreck It Ralph yet but from the trailers, everybody looks appealing to look at.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
THANK YOU!!! That's what I'M trying to say,but apparently EVERYONE is getting the wrong idea for some reason. Everyone is appealing in Wreck-it Ralph actually, especially Captain Coulhoun. または however her name is spelled.
hajirah4 posted 1年以上前
*
"Tangled did better because it had a better plot and better romance" - THIS. Absolutely, It has nothing to do with the medium または アニメーション style chosen for the movie, it's about whether または not the animators/writers/directors manage to convey enough magic and uplifting and inspirational messages in the final product. Personally, I think PATF did very well considering all the numerous and major flaws of the plot, I still 愛 the movie regardless of them though but I'm not a ファン of the way certain aspects and storylines of it (especially romance) were developed.
maryksand posted 1年以上前
Swanpride said:
Though the short they displayed before Wreck-it-Ralph apparently is made with CGI, but looks like handdrawn...if they manage to do that at one point, I won't complain (much). It's もっと見る about how the movie looks like than about how it was made.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
Jessikaroo said:
I think that's a bit unfair :o PatF grossed less than 塔の上のラプンツェル because it was a mess (though I do 愛 it). 塔の上のラプンツェル was better planned, had もっと見る ハート, 心 and was made because they wanted to really make it. Stupid animators...
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
this has nothing to do with the animators. do あなた know how happy they were, when they heard that patf would be handdrawn? many of them 愛 it, but the bosses of ディズニー just dont get enough money down their throats ( for their own taste, practially milking young girls and boys parents isnt enough as it seems)
Safira-09 posted 1年以上前
*
@Safira-09 -Yes, but what is the point? WHY are they so happy? IN the end, they didn't even gross as much money. And how can CGI make one movie get so much もっと見る money? It doesn't matter whether it's CGI または not. How does the アニメーション type effect the box office?
hajirah4 posted 1年以上前
Elemental-Aura said:
Are they nuts?! THAT'S IT!!!

Who has a time machine! Somebody needs to go back back and bring Walt ディズニー himself back here and let him know what the heck people are doing to his dreams!

He might've been open minded of the CGI 映画 and might 愛 Tangled, all the ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ and all the other ディズニー CGI movies. But replacing the future of all ディズニー 映画 to CGI 映画 is not on. Walt ディズニー would wanted both to co-exist with each other. Not get rid of the old bring in the new.

2D hand drawn アニメーション is what made Disney. I don't want everything my hero worked for his entire life to be replaced, pushed aside and forgotten...
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
あなた 発言しました it. I'm devastated. :(
MalloMar posted 1年以上前
*
Yes, in fact Walt ディズニー actually invented the multiplane camera, which was made for HAND ANIMATION.
hajirah4 posted 1年以上前
next question »