この質問に回答する

ビートルズ 質問

Do あなた think that Ringo and George should have sung more?

 thrillergirl18 posted 1年以上前
next question »

ビートルズ 回答

Anneka1010 said:
no coz otherwise they wouldnt be as good at playing there instrument coz they'd be too focused on singing
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
U have a point. I think they were the best at playing instruments. :)
rainandbomba posted 1年以上前
*
thanks mate u r a legend :)
Anneka1010 posted 1年以上前
*
歌う half the Beatles' songs didn't stop John または Paul's ability to play their instruments
Rubyrings posted 1年以上前
tkp353 said:
George had a tremendous backlog of 音楽 that he basically put into his first solo post-Beatles, which was a TRIPLE album. Some of his best music, in my opinion, were on this album. However, like Paul, his 音楽 missed John's middle eight bars, which distinguished many Beatle hits.

But, to answer the question...YES, George could have and should have sung もっと見る than the ONE song he was allowed per Beatle album.

NO, Ringo sang just enough on the songs that were written for him. Need proof? Check out the writers, backup artists and vocals on the three songs he put out after the Beatles breakup and you'll get the point.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
Rubyrings said:
Well, yes, I do. But I know John and Paul did their best to make sure George and Ringo got to sing some songs. And when あなた consider how many bands just have one lead singer and no one else sings anything....
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
next question »