I have a pet peeve.
As a writer, I have found my stuff 投稿されました on other websites without my permission, and sometimes without so much as a mention that it was MY article... または a link back to the original. This ticks me off, and it is illegal to do so.
I have not come across this on ファンポップ with 記事 yet, but I have seen it numerous times on images.
Some of the people I adore the most are even doing it. I have to assume innocence here and figure some folks just don't know... so I'ma tell ya ;)
Credit. Credit. Credit. The option to add the 写真 credit when あなた 提出する an image is there for a reason. It is to protect ファンポップ from massive headaches later on, and あなた from being sued.
あなた might 検索 for 画像 on Google, but that is not who to credit. When あなた find the image あなた want, there is a URL under it when あなた click on the image. From there it is easy to find the name of who owns that image. If it is not cited, then あなた need to cite that website in the credit to protect both yourself and Fanpop.
Not citing the copyright owner is theft, pure and simple. Besides, it is just the right thing to do.
As ファンポップ grows, もっと見る and もっと見る people are going to be taking notice. They are going to see their 画像 were taken without citing the owner. We do not want that kind of trouble around here.
In the case of movie and book covers, cite the studio または publisher of the book. That is way-easy to do. In the case of 写真 of stars and what have you, the photographer is the way to go, unless あなた can't find that info, then like I said; cite the website あなた found it on, または the star.
Please please please make the effort to do this. I do not want to see the 日 that Dave and Papa are forced to waste time removing thousands and thousands of 画像 because we did not take the time to do it right and legally...
Thank you, Drive through.
As a writer, I have found my stuff 投稿されました on other websites without my permission, and sometimes without so much as a mention that it was MY article... または a link back to the original. This ticks me off, and it is illegal to do so.
I have not come across this on ファンポップ with 記事 yet, but I have seen it numerous times on images.
Some of the people I adore the most are even doing it. I have to assume innocence here and figure some folks just don't know... so I'ma tell ya ;)
Credit. Credit. Credit. The option to add the 写真 credit when あなた 提出する an image is there for a reason. It is to protect ファンポップ from massive headaches later on, and あなた from being sued.
あなた might 検索 for 画像 on Google, but that is not who to credit. When あなた find the image あなた want, there is a URL under it when あなた click on the image. From there it is easy to find the name of who owns that image. If it is not cited, then あなた need to cite that website in the credit to protect both yourself and Fanpop.
Not citing the copyright owner is theft, pure and simple. Besides, it is just the right thing to do.
As ファンポップ grows, もっと見る and もっと見る people are going to be taking notice. They are going to see their 画像 were taken without citing the owner. We do not want that kind of trouble around here.
In the case of movie and book covers, cite the studio または publisher of the book. That is way-easy to do. In the case of 写真 of stars and what have you, the photographer is the way to go, unless あなた can't find that info, then like I said; cite the website あなた found it on, または the star.
Please please please make the effort to do this. I do not want to see the 日 that Dave and Papa are forced to waste time removing thousands and thousands of 画像 because we did not take the time to do it right and legally...
Thank you, Drive through.
