when あなた go around ファンポップ あなた will see there is an obvious era of ディズニー everyone's in favor of: The 90's but they are only successful because most of the members are from that era, they grew up with them and there for they think they are the best, and although that's great that they think so, that is far from successful economically.
Believe it または not シンデレラ is もっと見る successful than The Little Mermaid, and Lady and the Tramp is もっと見る successful than Aladdin. not によって much but still. this is exactly what I'm talking about. Many of the ディズニー 映画 of the late 30s- 60s are very well known but many people who didn't exist in that generation might say things like "its OK but its just old". when in fact many 映画 are very similar to others, Bambi and the Lion King, シンデレラ and Aladdin, and every ディズニー princess movie is very similar (they are all about a girl who wants something more). they just appeal to the audience of the generation more. with a few exceptions.
and one final note, remember what i 発言しました about monumentally successful, well here are some reviews of some very 人気 yet unsuccessful または less that monumental ディズニー 映画 (from Rottontomatoes.com)
The Hunchback of Notre Dame-
"Considering that ディズニー couldn't help but trash Victor Hugo's novel in the process of reforming it for tender young sensibilities, this animated adaptation of his Notre Dame de Paris is pricklier and もっと見る disturbing than we had any right to expect."
Mulan-
"Memo to the gang at Walt ディズニー animation: Your formula is showing."
Hercules-
[An] insipid, lifeless, animated feature.
Tarzan- " ディズニー Studios seems to 愛 the concept of feral children."
but 干し草, 乾草 half of the ディズニー 映画 that are in the ディズニー ボールト, 金庫, ヴォールト got reviews like these and look where they are today.
but be warned when あなた have kids, don't be surprized if they say things like
"Beauty and the Beast is ok, but its just...... old, i don't get it, i like Tangled/ Frozen/ whatever much better."
