I think I have rarely seen a movie as overrated as “Brave”. Hell, the thing got a freaking Oscar, and while I know which kind of politics were in play for that atrocity, it is frustrating to see this movie getting the critical acclaim over something as creative as “Wreck it Ralph”. They can talk about Merida’s hair as much as they want, the movie who should have gotten the awards for this one was “Tangled”, because that was the movie for which the software which was developed further in “Brave” was invented.
I disliked the idea of Merida in the Line-Up from the get-go, too. Mostly because I don’t like it when the ディズニー アニメーション Studios and ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ mix. They are two different flavours for me, and putting them together is like eating sausages in vanilla sauce – with ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ being the sausages, since this is the studio with goes for the meaty mix of crazy ideas, while the アニメーション Studios add a little sweetness to every story they tell. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, but both studios do what they do usually so good, they should stick to it.
This in mind, the idea of ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ making a ディズニー Princess movie bothered me. That it was advertised as the movie with the “better and もっと見る modern” Princess bothered me even more. But what bothers me the most are the reviews which praise the movie for providing an alternative to the ディズニー Princesses in their sparkly dresses – and not just because the sparkly dresses are mostly a product of the line-up. Even the princesses who actually have a sparkly dress in their movie, like Cinderella, Belle または Tiana, spend most of the time in their working clothes (or as frog), and Snow White, Pocahontas, ムーラン and Rapunzel don’t even have sparkly dresses in the first place. Just wait, Merida will sparkle too as soon as she is added to the line-up. (Ha…I wrote this part before the discussion about Merida’s new デザイン started…aren’t people hypocrite?)
But let’s have a look why Merida is supposedly such a great princess and role model:
1. She doesn’t want to marry and she stays single until the end of the movie
Big deal. Meet Jasmine. the first princess who fought against an arranged marriage – not the first one who had to face one, but Aurora kind of lucked out there. Still, Jasmine, pretty much like Merida, already was a princess who successfully fought for her right to make her own decisions. But I already hear the protests that ジャスミン does marry in the end nevertheless, just not a prince like she was supposed to, so:
Meet Pocahontas, the Princess who was supposed to marry Kokoum. So Merida doesn’t want to marry? Well, who would want to marry this bunch of simpletons presented to her? ジャスミン would have withstand those too. And Pocahontas actually had doubts to marry a good looking man and big warrior, who would have taken good care of her. And あなた know what? Despite Pocahontas finding the 愛 of her live, she doesn’t marry either. She stays with her tribe because she deemed her responsibilities もっと見る important that marriage.
2. She is a fighter
Yes, Merida has a bow and knows how to survive in the wilderness. That doesn’t change the fact that she spends most of her movie getting rescued, mostly によって her mother, but one time even によって her little brothers because she got locked in. Wow…that’s…impressive?
Meet Rapunzel, あなた know, the girly princess in the purple dress, who spend all her life in the tower. And then goes, faces the outside world, ruffians, swings herself and Flynn to safety with her hair and in the end frees herself from an abusive relationship.
In fact, meet any of the Princesses and have a good look how they faced challenges, abuse, fought for their believes and came out on 上, ページのトップへ at the end of it, but above all…
Meet Mulan, the princess who wasn’t a tomboy at all, but nevertheless managed to become a true warrior, who went and rescued China. Merida might be good in with a bow, but the power she has is not based on it. All the power she has (or her mother has) is based on birth または marriage. The power ムーラン has is based on her heroic deeds. She might choose to decline to be an advisor, but it is her choice, she fought for what she thought was right and now she can truly command over her own fate. Merida on the other hand might not have to marry when the movie is over, but otherwise, not a lot of her fate has changed. She is still a princess, she still has the responsibilities of a princess and I frankly don’t see her leading an army または going off in the wilderness または whatever she wants to be if not a princess.
3. “Brave” is such a feminist movie because it provides an entirely female point of view
I give it to “Brave”: The relationship between mother and daughter is rarely explored in 映画 (or literature for that matter), unless it’s an abusive relationship like the one in “Tangled”. I guess mostly because in the mind of the writers, the mother is the understanding and supportive one, while the father is the overprotective one. But tackling this theme doesn’t necessarily make the movie feminist. A while 前 I wrote about the level of feminism in ディズニー movies. If あなた haven’t already, あなた can read the 記事 link.
Let’s see where “Brave” fits into that list.
I gave “Sleeping Beauty” the 上, ページのトップへ spot because of the mostly female, very powerful and, in case of the fairies, neither young nor beautiful cast. メリダとおそろしの森 has exactly three female characters, and the only non-beautiful one is a practically mute servant, who mostly serves as comic relief. That leaves Merida and her mother, who, as I already pointed out, are not powerful in their own right, but only in their relationship to men. So, let’s 移動する one place down to
“Tangled”, which I still can’t praise enough for being the first ディズニー Princess movie which is not about a female character, but about a character who happens to be female. Never mind that Rapunzel is also the first ディズニー Princess who becomes a regent at the end of the movie. “Brave” on the other hand is all about Merida being female. And does anyone believe that she will reign anything later on, unless she decides to marry the right man after all? That she will take over for her father and not one of her brothers?
Do I really have to discuss if “Brave” can keep up with “Mulan”? Aside from ムーラン being way もっと見る a fighter than Merida, her movie is also a serious コメント on gender-issues. It plays with the concept of it, but at the end of the day, ムーラン fails when she tries to act like a perfect woman, and she fails when she tries to act like a man. It’s only when she concentrates on her own strengths instead of following gender rules that she succeeds. Plus, “Mulan” was a big step away from the “I want” princesses, which dominated the Renaissance era. “Brave” is a big step back in this direction instead of a step forward.
Let’s cut the chase: In terms of feminism, it belongs to the very bottom of my list, along the same level of “Aladdin” and “Cinderella” – with the difference that ジャスミン at least has the excuse of not being the protagonist of her movie, and シンデレラ having the excuse of being made in 1950, not 2012.
Merida is, at the end of the day, is just a whiny teenager with some hunting abilities. She is a terrible role model, even worse than Ariel. Yes, I know, Merida eventually acknowledges that she made a mistake によって trying to change her mother, while Ariel never really addresses her own culpability. But the difference is that Ariel went to the sea witch for a spell which changes her, not her father. While a little bit naïve and egoistic in her approach, she did something which affected mostly herself, and she didn’t know that Triton was the final target. Merida on the other hand asked for a spell to change the personality of her mother (am I the only one who is deeply disturbed によって the notion?), and even when her mother was in pain, the only thing she did was asking her, if she changed her mind already. That she needs the whole movie admit having done anything wrong is the opposite of a good role model for me. And yes, it’s kind of the point, but the whole mess is so obviously her fault that she comes off as a spoiled brat through all of this. It’s a character which says “It is okay to skip school if あなた prefer to roam free and learn skills which a truly important for survival”.
So, all in all, I don’t agree with the notion that メリダとおそろしの森 is somehow the “better” ディズニー Princess movie. Not having a romance doesn’t make the movie better, especially not when the entirely motivation of the main character is about not wanting to marry. によって the way, what exactly is the problem with ディズニー Princesses getting their prince? Robin フード got Marian, Tarzan got Jane, Liugini got Claudette, Mr. Incredible got Elasty Girl. In around 90 percent of the 映画 out there, and I talk about 映画 in general, not just animated movie, the hero gets his girl, so why shouldn’t the heroine get her boy?
What exactly is the point of removing everything typical for a ディズニー Princess movie, like being based on a fairy tale または legend (the story of メリダとおそろしの森 looks vaguely fairy tale like but is based on an original story, not on real folklore), the romance and the musical numbers, and then calling it a ディズニー Princess movie? At this rate I could just as well “Lilo and Stitch” a ディズニー Princess movie. And what’s wrong with 歌う characters? I know there are people out there who don’t like the musical numbers in the ディズニー movies, but that’s not even something typical for the ディズニー Princesses, with a few exceptions musical numbers are just part of what makes a good ディズニー movie. Complaining about is like saying “I don’t like that there are explosions in this action flick”. If あなた don’t like the genre, don’t watch it.
But moving away from what I expect of a good ディズニー Princess movie to what I expect of a good movie, “Brave” doesn’t hold up well at all. Some reviewers 発言しました they liked the first half and were disappointed によって the 秒 half. Others 発言しました they would have liked もっと見る of the issues addressed in the 秒 half. Oh, and I read a lot of compliments concerning the strong supportive cast.
Well, I like neither the first, nor the 秒 part. The first part has a terrible pacing. And a terrible voice over. Honestly, what happened there? This is Pixar! Pixar! The company which created the terrifying start of “Finding Nemo”, which explained immediately the relationship between father and son. The company which made me weep about Ellie in “Up” in under five minutes. And this company creates a long sequence in which the whole set-up of the movie is explained, instead of shown? This is like the overlong start sequence of “Pocahontas” (the cliff-diving is replaced with cliff climbing), only ten times worse.
In fact, I keep comparing this movie to “Pocahontas”, and considering that “Pocahontas” is my least favourite ディズニー Princess movie, that is not a good thing. Especially since “Pocahontas” wins in every aspect. It might be a movie with a bland and overdone story, but at least it has a proper build-up and conclusion. “Brave” is a mess of different plot points which got thrown in and mostly never really addressed. And あなた know what? I have read so many protests about “Pocahontas” questionable approach to a difficult part of history, but the movie I really expected to hear some protests about is “Brave”.
I tend to be very laid back about stereotypes in 映画 in TV-shows, and I tend to be a staunch defender of ディズニー concerning the racism issue, because I think at this point this is もっと見る a witch hunt than a serious discussion. But “Brave” is the first movie which made me feel very, very uncomfortable. I’m aware of the heritage of the makers but nevertheless: What were they thinking? The history of Scotland is a sad and bloody one, riddled with poverty, wars and suppression. Do I expect this addressed in a ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ movie? No. But I do expect that this folk gets treated with the same respect the Native Americans in “Pocahontas” got. As full-fledged characters, not as a bunch of silly ruffians, who have nothing better to do than to fight. “Good supporting cast”? Where exactly? Half of the supporting cast is mute, the other half is comic relief, and most of the jokes are based on “Oh, those silly Scots”. There are just too many stereotypes and not enough real character in this movie.
I always 発言しました that “Pocahontas” wouldn’t have needed a villain. The same is true for “Brave”, if there had been a real conflict between the clans it would have provided enough suspense. As it is, the conflict is just based on pride and as mature as a fight between two kindergarteners. And as suspenseful. At no point of the movie the impending war between the clans looks like a serious issue, because, あなた know, those silly scots, they will have a nice little brawl and then take a drink together. So to make up for that “Brave” offers some sort of quasi villain in the bear, but let’s face it, a bear, 魔法にかけられて または not, is not really an engaging character, and considering that everyone escapes this くま, クマ again and again, it never really seems to be as dangerous as, for example, the くま, クマ of “Fox and Hound”.
What “Brave” lacks the most is a sense of consequences. In “Pocahontas” Kokoum died. It was a down-played death, but he died, and Pocahontas felt guilty because of it. Every single ディズニー Movie has at least one moment in which everything seems to be lost. When Snow White and Aurora fall asleep, when Cinderella’s dress is ripped apart, when Ariel sees Eric chose someone else and later turns back into a mermaid, when アラジン is banished, when Belle makes the deal to free her father and later leaves the Beast, when ムーラン is left alone in the mountains, when Tiana and Rapunzel think that the man they 愛 betrayed them, those are the moments I can feel how high the stakes are, even though I know that eventually, everything will be good. “Brave” lacks this. There is a short moment when Merida believes that her mother will stay a bear, but that’s at the very end of the movie, at a point, where I can’t bring myself to care anymore after もっと見る than an 時 silly children’s movie.
Don’t get me wrong, “Brave” is not a bad movie – but a horrible overrated one. Not only do I think that it doesn’t deserve the academy award, I think that it didn’t even deserve the nomination. The only thing this movie has going for it is the animation. 全体, 全体的です “Brave” belongs to the 映画 in the ディズニー Canon which are mostly geared towards children, like “The Aristocats”, to the 映画 which are harmless fun, but lack the sense of drama which normally translates a “children’s movie” to a “family movie”. It’s as inconsistent in tone as “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” without any truly epic scenes to make it unforgettable.
Bottom line: I think that people are もっと見る impressed によって what the marketing 発言しました “Brave” would be and によって the “Pixar” label slapped on it than with what is really there. They buy into the notion that Merida is a character who somehow sticks it to the other princesses, without understanding that there is a difference between the line-up and the actual characters behind the sparkly dresses. It's not the 映画 which have to change - it's the line-up. And everyone who complains about Merida's new デザイン because it makes her look like "the other bland Princesses" has, imho, no idea what he is talking about.
I disliked the idea of Merida in the Line-Up from the get-go, too. Mostly because I don’t like it when the ディズニー アニメーション Studios and ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ mix. They are two different flavours for me, and putting them together is like eating sausages in vanilla sauce – with ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ being the sausages, since this is the studio with goes for the meaty mix of crazy ideas, while the アニメーション Studios add a little sweetness to every story they tell. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, but both studios do what they do usually so good, they should stick to it.
This in mind, the idea of ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ making a ディズニー Princess movie bothered me. That it was advertised as the movie with the “better and もっと見る modern” Princess bothered me even more. But what bothers me the most are the reviews which praise the movie for providing an alternative to the ディズニー Princesses in their sparkly dresses – and not just because the sparkly dresses are mostly a product of the line-up. Even the princesses who actually have a sparkly dress in their movie, like Cinderella, Belle または Tiana, spend most of the time in their working clothes (or as frog), and Snow White, Pocahontas, ムーラン and Rapunzel don’t even have sparkly dresses in the first place. Just wait, Merida will sparkle too as soon as she is added to the line-up. (Ha…I wrote this part before the discussion about Merida’s new デザイン started…aren’t people hypocrite?)
But let’s have a look why Merida is supposedly such a great princess and role model:
1. She doesn’t want to marry and she stays single until the end of the movie
2. She is a fighter
Meet Rapunzel, あなた know, the girly princess in the purple dress, who spend all her life in the tower. And then goes, faces the outside world, ruffians, swings herself and Flynn to safety with her hair and in the end frees herself from an abusive relationship.
In fact, meet any of the Princesses and have a good look how they faced challenges, abuse, fought for their believes and came out on 上, ページのトップへ at the end of it, but above all…
3. “Brave” is such a feminist movie because it provides an entirely female point of view
I give it to “Brave”: The relationship between mother and daughter is rarely explored in 映画 (or literature for that matter), unless it’s an abusive relationship like the one in “Tangled”. I guess mostly because in the mind of the writers, the mother is the understanding and supportive one, while the father is the overprotective one. But tackling this theme doesn’t necessarily make the movie feminist. A while 前 I wrote about the level of feminism in ディズニー movies. If あなた haven’t already, あなた can read the 記事 link.
Let’s see where “Brave” fits into that list.
I gave “Sleeping Beauty” the 上, ページのトップへ spot because of the mostly female, very powerful and, in case of the fairies, neither young nor beautiful cast. メリダとおそろしの森 has exactly three female characters, and the only non-beautiful one is a practically mute servant, who mostly serves as comic relief. That leaves Merida and her mother, who, as I already pointed out, are not powerful in their own right, but only in their relationship to men. So, let’s 移動する one place down to
“Tangled”, which I still can’t praise enough for being the first ディズニー Princess movie which is not about a female character, but about a character who happens to be female. Never mind that Rapunzel is also the first ディズニー Princess who becomes a regent at the end of the movie. “Brave” on the other hand is all about Merida being female. And does anyone believe that she will reign anything later on, unless she decides to marry the right man after all? That she will take over for her father and not one of her brothers?
Do I really have to discuss if “Brave” can keep up with “Mulan”? Aside from ムーラン being way もっと見る a fighter than Merida, her movie is also a serious コメント on gender-issues. It plays with the concept of it, but at the end of the day, ムーラン fails when she tries to act like a perfect woman, and she fails when she tries to act like a man. It’s only when she concentrates on her own strengths instead of following gender rules that she succeeds. Plus, “Mulan” was a big step away from the “I want” princesses, which dominated the Renaissance era. “Brave” is a big step back in this direction instead of a step forward.
Let’s cut the chase: In terms of feminism, it belongs to the very bottom of my list, along the same level of “Aladdin” and “Cinderella” – with the difference that ジャスミン at least has the excuse of not being the protagonist of her movie, and シンデレラ having the excuse of being made in 1950, not 2012.
Merida is, at the end of the day, is just a whiny teenager with some hunting abilities. She is a terrible role model, even worse than Ariel. Yes, I know, Merida eventually acknowledges that she made a mistake によって trying to change her mother, while Ariel never really addresses her own culpability. But the difference is that Ariel went to the sea witch for a spell which changes her, not her father. While a little bit naïve and egoistic in her approach, she did something which affected mostly herself, and she didn’t know that Triton was the final target. Merida on the other hand asked for a spell to change the personality of her mother (am I the only one who is deeply disturbed によって the notion?), and even when her mother was in pain, the only thing she did was asking her, if she changed her mind already. That she needs the whole movie admit having done anything wrong is the opposite of a good role model for me. And yes, it’s kind of the point, but the whole mess is so obviously her fault that she comes off as a spoiled brat through all of this. It’s a character which says “It is okay to skip school if あなた prefer to roam free and learn skills which a truly important for survival”.
So, all in all, I don’t agree with the notion that メリダとおそろしの森 is somehow the “better” ディズニー Princess movie. Not having a romance doesn’t make the movie better, especially not when the entirely motivation of the main character is about not wanting to marry. によって the way, what exactly is the problem with ディズニー Princesses getting their prince? Robin フード got Marian, Tarzan got Jane, Liugini got Claudette, Mr. Incredible got Elasty Girl. In around 90 percent of the 映画 out there, and I talk about 映画 in general, not just animated movie, the hero gets his girl, so why shouldn’t the heroine get her boy?
What exactly is the point of removing everything typical for a ディズニー Princess movie, like being based on a fairy tale または legend (the story of メリダとおそろしの森 looks vaguely fairy tale like but is based on an original story, not on real folklore), the romance and the musical numbers, and then calling it a ディズニー Princess movie? At this rate I could just as well “Lilo and Stitch” a ディズニー Princess movie. And what’s wrong with 歌う characters? I know there are people out there who don’t like the musical numbers in the ディズニー movies, but that’s not even something typical for the ディズニー Princesses, with a few exceptions musical numbers are just part of what makes a good ディズニー movie. Complaining about is like saying “I don’t like that there are explosions in this action flick”. If あなた don’t like the genre, don’t watch it.
But moving away from what I expect of a good ディズニー Princess movie to what I expect of a good movie, “Brave” doesn’t hold up well at all. Some reviewers 発言しました they liked the first half and were disappointed によって the 秒 half. Others 発言しました they would have liked もっと見る of the issues addressed in the 秒 half. Oh, and I read a lot of compliments concerning the strong supportive cast.
Well, I like neither the first, nor the 秒 part. The first part has a terrible pacing. And a terrible voice over. Honestly, what happened there? This is Pixar! Pixar! The company which created the terrifying start of “Finding Nemo”, which explained immediately the relationship between father and son. The company which made me weep about Ellie in “Up” in under five minutes. And this company creates a long sequence in which the whole set-up of the movie is explained, instead of shown? This is like the overlong start sequence of “Pocahontas” (the cliff-diving is replaced with cliff climbing), only ten times worse.
In fact, I keep comparing this movie to “Pocahontas”, and considering that “Pocahontas” is my least favourite ディズニー Princess movie, that is not a good thing. Especially since “Pocahontas” wins in every aspect. It might be a movie with a bland and overdone story, but at least it has a proper build-up and conclusion. “Brave” is a mess of different plot points which got thrown in and mostly never really addressed. And あなた know what? I have read so many protests about “Pocahontas” questionable approach to a difficult part of history, but the movie I really expected to hear some protests about is “Brave”.
I tend to be very laid back about stereotypes in 映画 in TV-shows, and I tend to be a staunch defender of ディズニー concerning the racism issue, because I think at this point this is もっと見る a witch hunt than a serious discussion. But “Brave” is the first movie which made me feel very, very uncomfortable. I’m aware of the heritage of the makers but nevertheless: What were they thinking? The history of Scotland is a sad and bloody one, riddled with poverty, wars and suppression. Do I expect this addressed in a ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ movie? No. But I do expect that this folk gets treated with the same respect the Native Americans in “Pocahontas” got. As full-fledged characters, not as a bunch of silly ruffians, who have nothing better to do than to fight. “Good supporting cast”? Where exactly? Half of the supporting cast is mute, the other half is comic relief, and most of the jokes are based on “Oh, those silly Scots”. There are just too many stereotypes and not enough real character in this movie.
I always 発言しました that “Pocahontas” wouldn’t have needed a villain. The same is true for “Brave”, if there had been a real conflict between the clans it would have provided enough suspense. As it is, the conflict is just based on pride and as mature as a fight between two kindergarteners. And as suspenseful. At no point of the movie the impending war between the clans looks like a serious issue, because, あなた know, those silly scots, they will have a nice little brawl and then take a drink together. So to make up for that “Brave” offers some sort of quasi villain in the bear, but let’s face it, a bear, 魔法にかけられて または not, is not really an engaging character, and considering that everyone escapes this くま, クマ again and again, it never really seems to be as dangerous as, for example, the くま, クマ of “Fox and Hound”.
Unless あなた are named Merida.
Don’t get me wrong, “Brave” is not a bad movie – but a horrible overrated one. Not only do I think that it doesn’t deserve the academy award, I think that it didn’t even deserve the nomination. The only thing this movie has going for it is the animation. 全体, 全体的です “Brave” belongs to the 映画 in the ディズニー Canon which are mostly geared towards children, like “The Aristocats”, to the 映画 which are harmless fun, but lack the sense of drama which normally translates a “children’s movie” to a “family movie”. It’s as inconsistent in tone as “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” without any truly epic scenes to make it unforgettable.
Bottom line: I think that people are もっと見る impressed によって what the marketing 発言しました “Brave” would be and によって the “Pixar” label slapped on it than with what is really there. They buy into the notion that Merida is a character who somehow sticks it to the other princesses, without understanding that there is a difference between the line-up and the actual characters behind the sparkly dresses. It's not the 映画 which have to change - it's the line-up. And everyone who complains about Merida's new デザイン because it makes her look like "the other bland Princesses" has, imho, no idea what he is talking about.
What you want is what you get.
Gothic Kelly Clarkson
