この質問に回答する

ディズニープリンセス 質問

What went wrong with "Pocahontas"?, and why/how did it push away interest in WDAS?

There is common knowledge that the ディズニー Renaissance and traditional アニメーション took a dent with this film, which I somewhat agree with. The best of the best were working on this film, and the others were working on "The Lion King", which grossed over $700 million in 1994. The company was on 上, ページのトップへ again, and they were kind of running a formula with "The Little Mermaid", "Beauty and the Beast", "Aladdin", and "The lion King", which they used in Pocahontas to guarantee a big hit; do あなた think that this film destroyed the famous ディズニー formula? I think that is a part of it, but I know that there are others. The studio was not releasing flops at this point in time, (which they would be in 5-10 years); I just think it was a bump in the road, not the killer of people's interest in WDAS and Traditional Animation. So, I am practically asking why is the film no very good and why/did it kill people's interest in Traditional アニメーション and WDAS?
 What went wrong with "Pocahontas"?, and why/how did it push away interest in WDAS?
 Jayden-G posted 1年以上前
next question »

ディズニープリンセス 回答

maryksand said:
There are legitimate issues with the movie in regards to representation of Native American culture seeing as it largely oversimplified and overmysticized it, in addition to taking the (admittedly tragic) life of an actual person as a base for their romance driven story that had nothing to do with accurately reflecting the historical context (worked quite well for Don Bluth's アナスタシア though, however, Pocahontas is a vastly different case seeing as the primary conflict of the plot was specifically designed to revolve around an incredibly touchy subject such as oppression and invasion of Native Americans and their land rather than borrowing creative ideas from a certain isolated historical incident). Personally, I prefer Pocahontas as a movie to Lion King によって miles (and yes, I'm well aware of it being an immensely unpopular opinion). As a protagonist, Pocahontas demonstrates a sufficient amount of traits and qualities that make her the closest to representing a flawed, struggling human being. Her often confused, indecisive attitude makes her significantly もっと見る relatable than certain princesses that are written specifically to respond to all the outer/external factors instantly and in a way that the audience would admire their comprehension skills (i.e Mulan, Belle, Rapunzel, Tiana). Factions of the audience were unwilling to embrace a new formula not particulary prominent または common for ディズニー and accept a strong female character who doesn't end up in a traditional marriage (with it being presented in a far もっと見る consistent and effortfully structured way than the entire Merida's arc). The movie's flaws ended up being too glaring to overlook and it's positive innovations and challenging nature of certain storylines didn't sit well with people who expected a もっと見る traditional approach towards the concept of ディズニー Princess movie.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
I don't think that "actual person" aspect would have cause so much critic if the movie in itself had been better. They should have thought a little bit out of the box and created a movie without a villlain, because, seriously, the story doesn't need one, people of two entirely different cultures encountering each other would have been enough conflict. And I agree, they oversimplified. They should have adressed at one point what the foreign influence might do to the native culture.
Swanpride posted 1年以上前
*
I agree with the both of you. I prefer Pocahontas over The Lion King too, but I know The Lion King is a way better film. Now that I think about it, they oversimplified a lot in Pocahontas. The native culture is underplayed, the tension between the whites and natives are underplayed, Pocahontas and john's relationship is underplayed, John's development occurs through "Colors of the Wind". I don't know if anyone notices this, but this film is extremely short (like 1 時 and 10 分 maximum). They should have added もっと見る culture, and time do Pocahontas and John's relationship, tension between the natives and whites, and the native culture. They could have made John a bit もっと見る interesting too. An extra 15 分 could have made this film Disney's Best. Such wasted potential
Jayden-G posted 1年以上前
*
It's not my implications but the issues pointed out によって people who considered it racist. As a white person it's not my place to tell them they are wrong if they felt like it was problematic. Same applies to Pocahontas, just because I personally don't thin fiction should reflect reality in the first place doesn't mean native Americans are not entitled to addressing their issues with the movie. Both 映画 are problematic in regards to storyline development as well, Pocahontas just happened to contain specific flaws that put a large segment of the audience off the movie.
maryksand posted 1年以上前
Swanpride said:
On the most basic level: Pocahontas just has a very bland and very overdone story, and it just lacks a "stand-out" character...neither the villain nor Pocahontas herself are particularly creative, the only thing which really stands out is the animation, and that is a little bit problematic, too, because a lot of people have a hard time to appreciate it whenever ディズニー 映画 away from the "house style".
There were other aspects, though...for one, ディズニー just overused the formula. I like the DP movies, but when every single movie ディズニー does is that way, it becomes too much at one point. After Lion King, ディズニー should have done something entirely different, as some sort of breather, they should have experimented, instead they stuck with repeating the same stuff again and again. It was not Pocahontas alone, it was all the 映画 which came later on, too. によって the time ディズニー started to think outside the box, it was too late. At the point, ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ already had the reputation of making the unusual animated movies.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
I agree with あなた 100%. With the Golden, Silver and Dark Eras, they never really stuck with a specific formula until the Renaissance. After Pocahontas, they did have a lot of unnecessary sidekicks (Gargoyles in Hunchback, Tantor and Terk in Tarzan, Cricket in Mulan, don't know about Hercules) So, they should have branched out with the ミュージカル (they should have done what they did with Tarzan in Hunchback または something to give it a break) At the same time, if they released Atlantis または Treasure Planet, I don't think this drills would have done any better than they did in the early 2000s. The rise of ピクサー・アニメーション・スタジオ definitely had a part in it, but in the late 90s, there was still room for both. I think they should have made Pocahontas a bit もっと見る adult like what they did with The Lion King. They really wanted to tell big stories with Pocahontas, Hunchback, Mulan, and Tarzan, but they should have made them a bit もっと見る adult and serious (I still like those 映画 though). This formula thing is why I am worried about アナと雪の女王
Jayden-G posted 1年以上前
next question »