"Peter Pan" was my first Broadway musical, and is one of my お気に入り ミュージカル besides "The Phantom of the Opera," "Annie," and "Oliver!" When I was six my family and I went to BlockBuster and got the VHS tape of "Peter Pan" my mom had asked me "Do あなた know a woman named Mary Martin played Peter Pan?" I had seen the ディズニー version, so a woman playing Peter was special. I liked Peter because he didn't grow up, and he could fly. I watched the Mary Martin version with my family. My Brother, Sister, Mom, Dad, and me. I LOVED it もっと見る than the ディズニー version. Though we lived out in rural New Mexico...

A topic at インターネット・ムービー・データベース（IMDb） wonders about the Peter Pan (2003) movie having higher rating than Hook (1991.) A 一覧 of reasons why I personally feel the situation is unavoidable and deserved. And why in my opinion the 2003 movie should have even higher rating, both as a movie in itself and as a Peter Pan related movie. (And I think it actually does, the avarage rating when correctly calculated is higher than what IMDB's system claims.)

PETER PAN (2003): Storyline follows the original novel and even amazingly faithfully.
HOOK: Utterly alternate universe.

---> Staying true to original is essential if not...