この質問に回答する

ハンガー・ゲーム 質問

(I reget asking this but) does anybody besides me feel like Peeta should have died in the first book?

Don't get me wrong i 愛 Peeta, and the Hunger games but i have acual facts to back up my claim
1)Peeta was being used によって the Careers, who should have turned on him when they didn't need him
2) after the Careers found Katniss they didn't need Peeta to help them find Katniss so they didn't need him anymore and should have killed him
3) When Katniss found Peeta he had nlood poisening, and without proper care he should have died in two three days tops(based off my small medical knowledge)
 demigod324 posted 1年以上前
next question »

ハンガー・ゲーム 回答

missing_99 said:
If Peeta had died, there would be no trilogy. The Careers - Cato, really - turned on Peeta for returning to "save" Katniss after the tracker jacker attack. Well, they were never "for him" to turn on him, either. They had Katniss treed, but she wasn't dead. Even how it may have appeared, Katniss could have possibly escaped, maybe. I would also say they were playing on Peeta's confession. So if Katniss was not dead yet, there could still be room to use Peeta against her and for them. And, like Cato says, he was pretty good with a knife. So maybe he wasn't so useless, and he was strong.

Katniss was smart and assisted Peeta. They also had the medicine to help. Katniss fed him and tried to get his fever down. It wasn't long after Katniss found Peeta that the Games were soon to end. But Peeta didn't get off the hook, either. He ロスト a leg. And like others have said, it is up to the 作者 to decide who lives and dies. Characters who die are fated to die, and the ones who live are fated for that. I don't know if she planned a three-part series, but keeping Peeta alive worked.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
mockingjay2 said:
If he had died then the other 本 wouldn't have been as good nor the movie.i think the reason he didn't die is cuz Suzanne Collins had the idea to make a trio of 恋愛中 katniss, peeta and gale without peeta (the 3 book especially) would have been totally predictable and not as good .... Plus PEETA IS AWESOME AND HOT !!
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
exactly!
sunshinegirl123 posted 1年以上前
*
Yes I have to agree wth u
Dayana-Sustaita posted 1年以上前
*
agreed! :D
thehgfangirl posted 1年以上前
Animated_Paint said:
I think it would have been a cool and interesting plot twist :)
As much as I do 愛 the movie, and the books, if she had killed him off I think it would have had an interesting effect on the books, only I would rather have him killed in Catching Fire....
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
tacosauce77 said:
i think cato should have won
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
well the main character normally wins things, but I like Cato too.
wishey posted 1年以上前
*
Yes!! Agree! Best answer right here!!!!!!!
jammer54 posted 1年以上前
JasmineValdez said:
Logically, yes, but it is a book after all....
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
skydecourcyminn said:
Oh yea since i like gale i think that peeta should of just died he aint nothing but meat wasted
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
why? without him the 本 wouldnt be so interesting...and kinda boring too, i mean the whole 秒 book is based on him
thehgfangirl posted 1年以上前
seank23 said:
I get your reasoning but its not up to us weather または not a character dies in a book または not unless あなた are the one 書く the book.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
POPclogger216 said:
Oh, the fangirls attacking this...

Logically, yeah, you'e right, especially with the blood poisoning. But, being me, gotta contradict this.

1) They needed him up until they found Katniss in the 木, ツリー (and then, not soon after, the tracker jacker scene happens).

2) I would guess that they were hype after finding Katniss and having her trapped in the tree. theoretically, if あなた knew あなた would soon be able to off your greatest competition in a fight to the death, あなた may not be focusing on the nameless extra in the background (namely, Peeta). Cato would have probably killed him the 次 day, but then there was the tracker jacker nest... etc.

3) ... creative license. .3.

Now I wonder how the 本 would have progressed had Peeta not been there... unlike the fangirls here, I think Suzanne would have made them inteesting, with または without Peeta.

Thank あなた for putting your opinion out there, and taking a break from the "OMG Petta's soooooooooo hawt!!!11!!one!1" . Glad someone's not afraid to do that.

Good 日 to you, and don't forget to be awesome.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
I really like your answer. I think Peeta proved very valuable to either side of the war and thus made the story もっと見る interesting. Could have been interesting without him, sure, but oh the plot twists! DFTBA to あなた too.
banditsns1391 posted 1年以上前
silver93 said:
No, I don't think he should have died in the first book. First of all, he didn't have blood poisoning right away. And it's difficult to tell, because the chapters are so long, but Katniss got him medication for the poisoning almost right after she found him. Your 1 & 2 is pretty much the same thing. They kept Peeta around because they wanted him to find Katniss. Don't forget that Peeta is a fantastic speaker/liar so he can convince people pretty much anything. Cato did turn on Peeta once Katniss dropped the nest on him. He didn't turn on him right after finding Katniss probably because he wasn't positive if they were going to get her, または because he was just focused on Katniss not him. Since they never viewed Peeta as a concern, they didn't care when he died. It would be like how it was in the Quell; there were certain people they knew would make it till the end, and ones that would get killed eventually. Katniss wasn’t concerned with people she didn’t think would win because she knew it was only a matter of time before they were taken out. Cato just misjudged Peeta’s survival skills.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
next question »