She was better than Ruby 1.0 in that she didn't grate on my nerves and unlike 1.0 there was a moment [a brief moment] where I actually thought she might be on the Winchesters' side/good side. But overall not really a character I really cared about one way or the other.

^^^ It was the complete opposite for me, haha. I liked 1.0 and 2.0 irritated the bajeezus out of me. xP

^ I have to agree with you, but since it's still Ruby; I guess 6 then. I give the previous Ruby 9/10 :(

i like the first ruby, but this actress seems bad

Zero redeeming qualities. The double agent writing ruins what made Ruby actually interesting, and it doesn’t mesh well with Ruby 1.0’s actions. Genevieve Cortese’s acting is also awful; she feels nothing like Katie Cassidy’s portrayal at all while still managing to give a piss-poor performance even without Katie as a comparison point