posted by estudioso
Alright I just went through the Rolling Stone's 一覧 of the 100 Greatest artists of all time and Paul wasn't in there. That is appalling. Statistically he should be in the 上, ページのトップへ five. It is an outrage. Why would Rolling Stone do something like that. John Lennon made it and he only did a few albums. My theory is that the panel Rolling Stone assembled to make the 一覧 is incompetent, which is shown によって that mistake as well as many numerous other wrong and weird rankings. Also, I have heard that Rolling Stone magazine never really liked Paul McCartney and never took his 音楽 history, but still he should have been on that list.