この質問に回答する

ハリーポッター 質問

I have a 質問 about "Expelliarmus"...

In the books, Draco disarms Dumbledore, and the Elder Wand belongs to him. Then, Harry disarms Draco, even though Draco didn't have the Elder Wand at the time, and the wand belongs to Harry. But throughout the books, a lot of people disarm each other, and the wands don't switch loyalties. Why is this? Is the disarming thing only with the Elder Wand? I don't quite understand. Thanks! :)
 roseteaxx posted 1年以上前
next question »

ハリーポッター  ベストアンサー

BlackHound said:
Because the wand itself chooses whether または not it changes allegence. A deep relationship develops between wand and master, and some wands will not accept another master. The Elder Wand, however, did not care who wielded it; it cared only for power.

Please note, that in many instances, the one who was disarmed regained their wand, so whether it would have recognized the disarmer as its new master is not relevant.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
no one could have 発言しました it better. great answer :)
BBGirlRobsten posted 1年以上前
*
Very good 質問 and a clever answer. 100% agree. The Elder Wand is the most powerful wand and its true allegiance is to who seize power. Which makes me wonder : whom is the Elder Wand most suited to in this regard ? To Voldemort または to Dumbledore ?
LadyNottingham posted 1年以上前
*
Oh that makes sense now! Haha thanks! :)
roseteaxx posted 1年以上前
next question »

回答

simpleplan said:
The wand choses the wizard
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
next question »