I honestly don't think that the Disney sequels are as bad as people make them out to be. I mean, most of them are really harmless. I mean, there aren't very many that I think are awful and I just barely have enough to make a top 10 worst Disney sequels list. Even the ones that are really bad, even the awful ones, aren't as painful as a lot of people make them out to be. I mean, none of them are even deserving to be among the top 10 worst Disney movies. I mean, I've seen A LOT of AWFUL movies, both animated and live-action, and I can tell you there are A LOT worse out there, which make the Disney sequels really look harmless. I won't deny there are some bad sequels but that doesn't mean all of them are bad. There are a lot of decent ones and even some that I would describe as great and up to regular Disney's standards (yes, I went there).

I actually don't mind the CGI princesses. Yes, I'd like to see more traditionally hand-drawn ones in the future, but I don't think the CGI ones are as bad as some people make them out to be.

I know this is probably rude to say, but I just can't help but laugh my ass off every time I hear or see people say that Anna is a better developed and improved version of Rapunzel. I'm sorry, but in what world? The only thing Anna beats Rapunzel in is the looks department. Rapunzel actually grows, matures, and develops in her movie, Anna does not. She learns not to marry someone you just met at the last minute but that's it. Character development is non-existent in Frozen, so Anna is completely inferior to Rapunzel in my opinion. People say that Rapunzel is a Mary Sue but I ask, HOW? She has flaws! She's clumsy, awkward, insecure, shy, paranoid, a little reckless, naive, and ignorant. I hear people say she's also a Mary Sue because things come too easily to her but again, same thing happens with Anna and even Elsa. Anna is inexperienced but she's still shown as more skilled than Kristoff and constantly has to save him, who is supposed to be more skilled than her. Or Elsa being so skilled with her powers during Let It Go, despite having no real training and concealing her powers for almost all her life. Along with the fact that she conquers her anxiety and thaws the kingdom without even trying. You think that's not having things come easily to them? I'd say it's just as bad, if not worse, as it is with Rapunzel. Except, unlike Anna and Elsa, Rapunzel actually develops and matures. Plus, Anna's humor is A LOT more forced than Rapunzel's.

We technically know more about Aurora than we do about Elsa and Jasmine for that matter. Think about it, we know about their dreams and aspirations, Aurora?check Jasmine?check, we know how they react to things, Aurora?check Jasmine?check, we know what they're like in an everyday setting, Aurora?check Jasmine?nope. The thing is, we never see Jasmine in a non-conflicted setting. What does Jasmine do when she's not complaining about forced marriage, escaping palace life or grieving Aladdin's "death". Sure her personality's still strong enough to shine through but what is Jasmine like in NORMAL EVERYDAY setting? Basically, what I'm asking is what does Jasmine like to do in her spare time, her hobbies, her interests? We get to see some of this with Aurora. The only time we see Jasmine in a setting where she can just be herself is when she's brushing her hair. The problem with Jasmine is that she's dealing with conflict throughout most of her time on screen, other princesses have this problem like Cinderella, Mulan and of course Elsa. (MY TOP 4!) But all their personalities are strong enough to shine through EXCEPT Elsa and that's why I say Elsa has no personality. Because other princesses Cindy, Jas and Mulan, deal with conflict majority of their films but I can still pinpoint unique characteristics in them. Aurora would have the same problem, except she was allowed some time to be herself and showcase her personality and therefore I can find unique characteristics in her, UNlike Elsa.

I watch Disney/animated movies in general mainly for entertainment.
I don't analyze them nearly as much as a lot of Fanpoppers. However, I do think everyone else's debates, and observations are interesting, and they make me think a little harder about the movies.
In the end, I watch them simply to enjoy them or for "comfort."

I don't really give much of a care for the Marvel movies tbh. Then again my tastes in Marvel in general just go towards Spider-man and the Mutants. So a whole movie series based on Iron Man isn't really my thing (his character is an asshole in the comics). And I don't really like sometimes these things being connected, I just wanna watch Spider-man having fun, not him acting like a drooling fanboy over Captain America. (it's easy bc if i just wanna see Spidey-only action i can just go to his comics) That's why i'm kinda cold to the whole "Spider-man has been added to the MCU woo!!" thing.

I hate tumblr redesigns. I dislike when edgy tumblrinas grab classic characters and give them dyed pink hair, undercuts, piercings, tattoos and hipster clothing. they look awful.

We don't discuss about this much so Idk if it's unpopular but The Disney Heroines genderbent probably make better looking men than the Heroes themselves. I mean Elsa, Pocahontas, Kida, Anna, Cinderella, Esmeralda, Tiana are all insanely hot from the ones I've seen.

I'd like to see a continuation of The Princess and the Frog in the form of an animated short or a sequel. It's
an amazing movie, and I want to see more of it as opposed to a Frozen sequel. I know, Disney sequels aren't often spectacular, so maybe just a short. The could do something about Charlotte finding love, or something having to do with Naveen's kingdom, etc.

I think that Disney should add Kida as a DP before they even think about adding Anna or Elsa.

I can't be the only one who thinks Chernabog is hot, right? *hides* Also, I ship him hard with Maleficent.

I know for sure this is an unpopular Disney opinion, despite the critical acclaim and love it gets, I think Wall-E is a legit awful movie! I don't know why people love it so much. Yes, the environmental message is good and they only hammer it in a little bit and the animation is pretty (it's freaking pixar, so of course it does), but it's still an awful movie to me. The romance is poorly done and they lack chemistry, the characters are either boring or annoying, the villain comes out of nowhere, it's not engaging, it doesn't have much creativity to it, the writing is clunky, the main characters don't talk (which wouldn't be a problem if the characters were engaging or interesting), and is really BORING and DULL! Whenever I watch the movie, even when I first saw it and am usually wide away for even awful movies, I have a hard time sitting through it without falling asleep. It's a complete SNORE FEST! I mean, one of the problems (in my opinion anyway, which seems to be unpopular) in Spirit was that the animals didn't talk. However, it was still a good movie because at least the animals still had interesting personalities. But the characters in Wall-E that don't talk are either boring or annoying in my opinion, especially the villains and the two main characters. The only things I like about it are that fat couple are both cute characters and a cute couple, the animation is pretty (but Pixar has done MUCH better animation), the message is good (but not executed very well), and I do also kind of like the Captain and his curiosity with Earth. But overall, while unpopular opinion, I think it's a genuinely awful movie. It's not just because I hate it because I hate Mary Poppins but I think it's a brilliantly well-done and genuinely good movie.

As I said on the CAMH version of this, I think Facilier is pretty attractive. Not as hot as Naveen but dude's got some undeniable charisma.

And talking about overrated Pixar movies...I never got the appeal of Up, nor Toy Story 3. I never really liked Up nor connected with it, it always seemed a pretentious film to me (it seems to be made for only the critics of Hollywood (old white men) to like), and Toy Story 3, it seemed a little too melodramatic and took itself too seriously at times to be enjoyable. And I could never connect with the audience who was all "omg my childhood!! i'm crying!!" at the end. I mean I cried, but mostly because I felt so sad for the toys (characters that I DO like), who loved Andy so much and would miss him dearly. I didn't tear up because I "saw" myself in that ending, giving away my childhood to prepare for adulthood. I never saw it, but apparently the rest of the world did.

I prefer Giselle with Prince Edward. XD

I'm not sure if this is unpopular opinion or not but whenever I'm debating, I'm never really trying to change someones opinion, especially since I know that I'm likely not to. Anyway I've changed someones opinion it's always a surprise to me. I'm just trying to share my point of view, I'm usually blunt about it that makes it seem rude but I'm not trying to be rude. Usually if I meet someone on Fanpop who agrees with everything I say (which only happened with two users) it freaks me out. Luckily, I find plenty of differences between us, which makes me relieved. I think most people would be happy to have someone who agrees with them on everything but I really don't. I mean, that's basically like just being with me and I don't want to be with me, I'M WITH ME ALL THE TIME! I love hearing different opinions and sharing different opinions because they can tell me something I've never thought of or I could be sharing with them something they've never thought about.

Jasmine is not independent, I give her credit for choosing to leave the palace all on her own and not just doing out of spite (Ariel) or waiting for an opportunity to present itself (Rapunzel). But she does depend on Aladdin a lot and while she gets points for trying her best, ultimately she's not an independent princess.

Aurora is not kind. I see this word used to describe her a lot. Yeah, it's technically not true, there's no real evidence of this. She's not unkind but she doesn't explicitly display kindness either. Obedient and polite yes, kind, no. And yes, there is a difference.

Snow White is not shy. Yeah, I really don't see where people get this from. I think some people just automatically equate her childlike appearance and high-pitched voice with shyness. She's one of the LEAST shy princesses actually.

Cinderella is not all that passive. Okay, I was guilty of saying this myself back in the old days but now I see that her passivity is all that bad. In fact, I'd say she's kinda passive aggressive. Aurora's more passive.

I wouldn't say Ariel's not brave but I think fearless is a better word. She's a daredevil risk taker, doing dangerous things seems like a casual thing for her, remains very calm during a shark attack, that's great but it's not really bravery. She's does display some courage but not to the point where it's noteworthy.

Rapunzel is not funny
Belle is not perfect
Tiana is not mean
POCAHONTAS IS NOT SMART!

Mulan is not a tomboy. Yes, we've been through this many times, she's not. Honestly, calling her a tomboy is like calling Velma from Scooby Doo or Raven from Teen Titans a tomboy. I can understand where people are coming from when they say that however, it's really not the case.

I honestly don't see any problem with someone constantly making polls about a certain character or movie that they love. I've seen people get upset because they're annoyed by their obsession. So what? Just ignore it! I mean, isn't it better to obsess over something positive than to obsess over something negative? If someone is bugged by an obsession I have, I really don't care because it's not my problem. If someone is bugged over an obsession someone has than maybe they shouldn't be on here, since people are supposed to be allowed to express their love and opinion over things they enjoy.

This may've been said, but I'll go ahead and say it. I'd love to see a sequel to Brave. About the love interest-if they add one, great. If they don't, that's fine too.

Merida would probably be low on my DP list if I had one, but I love seeing her high/first on other users' lists.

I don't find Belle perfect. It's true that the whole "She's the weirdest girl in town and everyone talks about her and omg she's so gorgeous" thing at the beginning is pretty Mary Suish (although I really don't like using that term), but I find her a very interesting character and actually, I love her because she has the same flaws with me.

She's lonely, but it's partly her fault, since she finds everyone else too "simple" for her tastes, so she always stays by herself. There are obviously more people who read in the town, but she's not willing to try and make some friends. In my opinion, she has the special snowflake syndrom, where she kind of thinks she's better than anyone else, more intellectual and independent. She takes pride in being "weird". She wants so much more than a simple, boring life, but she doesn't really do anything about it.

She's just so influenced by her books that she feels like a book heroine herself and I have a feeling that maybe Disney made her on purpose seem a bit "too perfect" at the beginning, because that's how she sees herself too, in a way.

To sum up, Belle is a hipster. xD

It bothers me that people scream "Incest, ew!" whenever The Lion King II: Simba's Pride is brought up. It is clearly stated in the movie that Kovu is NOT Scar's son, and is most likely not related to Kiara. Why doesn't anyone look at the first movie from that point of view? It's likely that Nala's father is Mufasa or Scar, both related to Simba, but that doesn't bother anyone. Of course, her father could be a rogue lion, but it's common for the male of a pride to have multiple mates. I guess I shouldn't put lion logic in a movie about talking animals, but I think people think of them too much as humans (which in a way, makes sense because they have human emotions and use dialogue).

I think Esmeralda should be the main character in The Hunchback of Notre Dame. I'm not sure since I never actually finished the book, but I always thought she was the protagonist in Victor Hugo's novel. And yeah, I am definitely a little bit biased since she's my favorite animated female, but, while I adore Quasimodo, I believe it would make much more sense if she was the main character, seeing as the story is about her anyway.

Like UnholyNoise pointed out in a comment to another confession I made, the whole movie revolves around her. She influences Quasimodo, Phoebus and Frollo and she is the cause behind these three guys' actions.

Also, while I love her to bits, the movie practically screams to us "Oh look! Look how awesome and sweet and selfless and badass and misunderstood she is!". I do think she has flaws, but I can see why so many people find her too perfect. So while I already find her an interesting character, I think she had so much more potential, if only she was given more screentime.

(btw HOND is my favorite animated movie, so it's not like I don't like it because it has Quasimodo as a protagonist, he's awesome, I just wanted to say that it could have been done in a different way and still turn out amazing, at least in my humble opinion)

I prefer sequel-Mulan to original Mulan. and I like the idea of her becoming a teacher (a job I think suits her way more than the usual ones people suggest like a karate instructor or whatnot) and getting married.

Cinderella is in my top 5 for most of my lists- role models, beauty, wardrobes, favorites, etc.

I don't get why people say The Lion King and Frozen are the same movie. Every time I see that theory, I'm like "What in the living hell do you mean?". I think they're 2 TOTALLY different movies. To me, the whole damn comparison thing on those movies sounds confusing.

I think that Frozen is a genuinely awful movie. The writing is beyond lazy, it has TONS of plot-holes that are never explained, it's sexist towards men, Anna and Kristoff have no chemistry and are a horrible couple, I feel absolutely NOTHING for Anna and Elsa's relationship, the Hans reveal was STUPID and out of nowhere, the trolls are annoying as hell, the characters don't have conversations like normal people, they hammer in the message about not marrying someone you just met, the villains are lame, it's rushed, the characters are one-dimensional and don't develop, we don't get to know the characters, I can't get into the Arendelle atmosphere, the songs (while great) don't transition well, and the humor is just horrible. If people think Rapunzel and the movie Tangled are forced and over-the-top, Anna and the movie Frozen are a MILLION TIME more forced and over-the-top than they are.

Many complain about how hard it is to think up lists and say that hate doing it. However, I actually LOVE to think up lists. I find it to be REALLY fun and will usually make a list for anything.

I think people are WAAAAAAAAAY TOO HARD on Disney Princess Enchanted Tales: Follow Your Dreams. I mean, I'm never one to say that Disney is just for kids but this movie actually was just intended for little girls. I mean, the message isn't subtle, it acts like a Disney junior show (like Sofia The First), and the beginnings and endings of both of Aurora and Jasmine's stories have Aurora and Jasmine talking to the audience. IT'S MEANT FOR LITTLE GIRLS! I give things like this a pass because I'm not the target audience for this movie and neither is anyone who complains about it. Besides, it's definitely not awful as everyone says or even that bad. It's harmless and again, WE'RE NOT THE TARGET AUDIENCE! When you see the words Disney Princess and the trailers show a cheesy message is in it, don't hold it to such high standards and realize that little girls are meant to be who it's meant for. It's not like Sleeping Beauty or Aladdin where it's meant for people of all ages. Besides, I think it did a decent job of developing Aurora's personality.

I once saw someone call Tangled "Dreamworky". Huh? It's not. I'd say it's the MOST Disney-esque non-classic DP movie next to The Little Mermaid. It is because it's CGI? Alot of people call PATF the odd one out when it comes to the moderns but I'd say Tangled. Other than the modern slang, it FEELS the most like Disney to me

I think Gaston is one of the greatest villains. He's more than meets the eye and I sometimes feel like the only one who loves him.

Call me a purist, because I'd like to see the original 6 DP on more merchandise again.

I know that Sven seems to be based on Maximus but I still much prefer him to Maximus. Maximus is like the devil horse, he can be quite annoying and uptight, he is way too dutiful. He goes to such big extremes, it's scary. Sven on the other hand is fun loving and friendly, Kristoff's best friend. He's lovable and cute. I don't hate Maximus but he's my favorite character in Tangled and I actually like Sven, though he isn't my favorite Frozen character. Ooh, here is a big unpopular opinion here on Fanpop, I still like Frozen and I never disliked it although it has never been my favorite. I see its flaws but I don't mind them because the film still entertains me.

I think Disney fans that complain about the show Once Upon A Time are REALLY overly-sensitive and nitpicky. "OH AURORA'S A BRUNETTE!" or "OH BEAST IS RUMPELSTILTSKIN!" or whatever! It's not meant to be the same! If the stories were exactly the same as the animated movies, why watch the show at all? It's a different interpretation and it bugs me how some Disney fans, especially huge fans of the classics, are basically all like "NOOOOOOO!!!!!! I DON'T WANT CHANGE IN MY DISNEY CHARACTERS! EVERYTHING IN MY UTOPIA NOSTALGIA IS SUPPOSED TO STAY THE SAME!" I mean, I hate that Ariel didn't become a main character but that doesn't stop me from loving it. Plus people complaining that it was supposed to be about something, something. BIG FREAKING DEAL! I'm sorry if I come across as rude but I just had to say this.

What if they created a princess with mind-control powers? I was laying in bed last night thinking about that and I was like "I need to put this in the confession forum.". Honestly, I think it'd be kinda cool if they did that.

My favorite Princess when I was a kid was Jasmine by far and she remained my fave until I turned 18. I also liked Mulan and Snow White. I was a weird kid I guess because these aren't generally little girls' favorites from what I read and see. Anyone else?

Elsa is NOT as dutiful as people think she is. Not only does she run away from her problems and never faces them, but she did that before she revealed her powers. "But it's only for today," NO IT'S NOT ELSA! You're the QUEEN, you're going to have to talk to and see people because that's part of your duties as QUEEN! She can't just be crowned at her coronation and just never have to deal with any duties but that's exactly what she thinks she can do. I'm afraid it doesn't work that way and it shows that she's not dutiful.

This is more related to the DP board, but I feel like "feminist" is often used as a four-letter word around here. And it makes feminists like me feel sort of unwelcome.

Since we're on a feminist kick right now. Why do people think Jasmine is one of the most feminist princesses? I LOVE Jasmine, she's my #2 but I'll be one of the first people to admit she's not one of the strongest princesses from a feminist standpoint. I think I have an idea for an article in near future.

1. She has to rescued by Aladdin, she can't even walk through a market casually without needing his help.
2. She has a habit of humiliating men, and yes it has more to do with status than gender but she makes generalizations and assumptions about her suitors, which kinda goes against one of the things feminism stands for.
3. She makes an independent decision to leave her palace but she doesn't make any progress, she ends up right back to where she was.
4. She TALKS about her rights as a human being but doesn't take much action. Especially considering most of the talking is complaining, not reasoning.
5. She tries to contribute some heroism which is admirable but fails miserably at every turn.
6. And it is ultimately Aladdin that drives the Sultan to get rid off of the marriage law, not years of Jasmine voicing her complaints.

So she uses her voice, very aggressively, but that doesn't cause any affect. She tries to be independent by running away, instead of handling her conflict diplomatically a la Poca or Merida, and ends depending on a man, Aladdin, not only to rescue her from danger several times but to resolve her conflict of forced marriage. Yeah, not that feminist in my opinion, I still love her though.

Am I the only one here, who doesnt like Maleficent (2014).
The story was sort of lame........I mean Maleficent was originally a badass disney villian and this movie turned her totally into someone else.
Bonus: Elle fanning is very annoying.

I've never found the song "You'll be in my heart" from Tarzan to be romantic.

Am I the only one who DIDN'T see Princess Leia joining the lineup when Disney bought Star Wars?

I would like to see a DP couple where the girl is older than the the guy. I know that's the case of certain Disney couples e.g. Kida/Milo, Meg/Herc but with K/M, it's only a technical thing and there's no actual proof for M/H.

I think people mistake overrated with not personally caring much for the character or the movie. I mean, I hate the movie Mary Poppins because it bores me, I can't get into the characters, and the songs just come out of nowhere (even for musical standards). However, I think it's a brilliantly well-done movie that deserves all the praise and popularity that it gets, even if it doesn't really do anything for me. I mean, I like the movie Hercules but it is a genuinely flawed and bad movie, but I still enjoy it. I mean, that's not to say there isn't overrated stuff out there, for lack of a better example, FROZEN! It's poorly done and I don't get the appeal other than the songs and animation. I know this confession is kind of confusing but I just had to share this.

Often times, when I see people depicting Elsa as being cruel to the other princesses for falling in love with men they just met, it just seems like they ignore Elsa's character and project their insecurities onto her (not all, but some single people have this mentality of "fuck those bitches with boyfriends/girlfriends they're all a bunch of sluts for not dating me!")

I know people are going to disagree with me on this but I think Hercules is a genuinely bad movie but it's a bad movie that I like. I enjoy the music, the villain, most of the characters, and the animation is beautiful (though the designs suck). Hercules himself is okay but he's pretty much a meathead that has no common sense and relies too much on his strength and never learns to use his head, even though Phil keeps on telling him to. Shouldn't he know after the first time he did it that cutting the head of the hydra wasn't going to work? Plus those dang plot holes and bad story writing really makes it a bad movie but it's one that I enjoy. It's not something that's in my top 50 favorite Disney movies but I still enjoy it a lot but I admit that it's a genuinely bad movie.

Aurora isn't as mysterious as people would like to believe. When I think of a mysterious character I think of characters like Black Widow from The Avengers movies. I mean, we know her personality but we didn't know her past until Age of Ultron. It explains why she is the way she is but still left us wanting more. People say Aurora is three-dimensional and mysterious because we have to guess what her personality is and basically project themselves onto her. She's basically a blank slate. Not knowing much about her personality doesn't make her mysterious or three-dimensional, it's actually the exact opposite and it more bad writing in my opinion. Aurora does have a personality but it's one-dimensional. If I didn't know better, I'd say that's why people hate the Keys To The Kingdom version of her where they give her a three-dimensional personality, which means they can no longer guess what her personality is or project themselves onto her. I even saw someone on youtube actually admit that they love Aurora so much because she's a blank slate.

(If there's already a princess with this, humor me.) What if they created a princess with anger issues? I'm saying this out of context because of 2 things. 1. It'd give girls with anger issues someone to relate to. 2. You guys have NO IDEA how MAD my brother made me today! (Kinda personal, but still, y'all should get my point.)

I've never had a problem with portrayal of men in Frozen. The portrayal of men in Brave is what offends me as a male and I find extremely sexist. The vulgar, idiotic representation of adult men as crude immature simpletons who are constantly played up as a joke.

At least the men in Frozen are meant to be taken seriously. All the characters in Frozen, male and female, are equally two dimensional. Anna is a walking statement of "modern normal perfect girl to relate to" while Kristoff is "scruffy unconventional perfect guy". So they're equal. Elsa just serves as an audience avatar to "inspire" people and Hans just serves as a device to enforce the "it's not about boys" half in the movie's "it's not about boys, it's about sisters" message. So all four of them are equal, all four of them are mentally unstable, all four of them are portrayed as competent. The point is, with exception of Mr. Weasel whatever is his name, we're SUPPOSED to take the men in Frozen seriously, not as a joke like all the men in Brave. We're supposed to take Kristoff and Hans seriously as a hero and a villain. I agree that Frozen perpetuates stupid, poor and messed up ideas of feminism but it's portrayal of men is not one of them.

I personally like Shanti better in the sequel to The Jungle Book than I do in the original. She has more of a three-dimensional personality. She's responsible and she does fear the jungle (for obvious reasons) but she also has a fun and sassy personality and tries to overcome her fear in order to help a friend (even if the friend is mad at her). I never understood why people disliked her so much but loved her in the original movie. She was just a plot device in the original and was just there to lure Mowgli into the village in a way that makes him seem very shallow and emotionless about leaving his home. In the sequel she has an actual identity.