この質問に回答する

ディベート 質問

How do あなた feel about the not-too-distant prospect of genetic discrimination?

If you've seen the movie Gattaca, you'll know what I'm talking about here.

It's been over a decade since we cracked the human genome, managing to decode the entire mess into a 一覧 of genetic sequences, most of which we still don't understand. What's happened in that time? We've figured out quite a bit of how those sequences work, but もっと見る importantly, we've managed to vastly improve the speed at which we can decode the genome, as well as the cost necessary to do so. There's no doubt that that amount of time and cost will continue to decrease as technology moves forward.

So what does this mean? Well, at some point in the future, those values will decrease to a point at which this technology will basically be available to everyone. When that happens, we can expect people to use it, specifically those people who have something to gain from its use (or, at least, a perceived gain). People hiring for new jobs will make a certain genetic quotient necessary in order to be hired. Health insurance companies will use that information to allow または deny coverage based on a propensity for certain illnesses. Sure, we can create laws that prevent this to some extent (under George W. Bush, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 was passed, which is a good start), but with the technology being so cheap and effective, there's little doubt that those who stand to gain the most will circumvent them.

The news isn't all bad, however. Scientists have discovered that there are multiple other factors involved in how we as human beings express our genetic code. The proteome (the entire set of proteins in our bodies) is becoming もっと見る and もっと見る important, since many of the genes in our bodies aren't expressed または used, while all the proteins are usually quite active. This places some doubt on the idea that one can easily determine a person's future using just their DNA.

Nonetheless, this form of discrimination is coming. So my 質問 is two-fold: how do yo
 whiteflame55 posted 1年以上前
next question »

ディベート 回答

Chaann94 said:
Well to be honest this type of discrimination will never start at all.

It's against the law for companies (or anyone) to do ランダム DNA tests. You'd either have to have a warrant for that または the person's conscent.

Also, everyone who knows anything about genetics knows that a personality is formed によって nature and nurture. So both your genes as how you're raised makes who あなた are.

So companies will know better than to judge only 50% of their employees.
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
Fair enough, but I think you're missing a couple of the key points I made in this question. At some point, DNA tests are going to become incredibly fast, accurate, and inexpensive. Sure, it'll likely remain against the law, but health insurance companies and companies that are hiring people on hardly need to provide the results of a DNA test as a reason. A health insurance company can simply say you're too big of a risk without giving any information about why. A hiring company has it even easier - they don't even have to give あなた a reason. And who's going to investigate to make sure they're not doing this? Sure, when they're using million dollar, desk-sized DNA testing machines, it's simple enough to follow the trail. But when the technology becomes the size of a smartphone, that's easy to hide. You're right about the nature and nurture aspect, but let's face it, there's a benefit to knowing what the genetic code of a potential applicant is. There's a certain likelihood increase または decrease that that person will make a viable employee that あなた can divine from just the genetic code. Sure, some companies will ignore that information, but they will do so at their own peril.
whiteflame55 posted 1年以上前
*
A hiring company doesn't need to tell あなた why you're not hired. BUT... they can't refuse to hire あなた based on any form of discrimination. Also genetics alone have nothing to do with how people are functioning. For instance I have the genes to get varicose veins but I go to a doctor to help preventing that. My cousin has the genetics to go to a good university. But his parents didn't encourage him enough so he became lazy and all into girls and now he dropped out of high school. The hiring companies know that too, actually the whole world knows. Also it's tricky to say something about the future, maybe there will be an ice age in 10 years and no one will have a car anymore but we'll have mammoths again :P
Chaann94 posted 1年以上前
*
...That's not what I 発言しました at all. I 発言しました that the idea of doing a genetic test is not mutually exclusive from a physical test. あなた stated that the physical test is もっと見る important. I agreed, but I also stated that the genetic component is huge and cannot be dismissed. Also, I stated very clearly thatthe purpose of the genetic tests isn't solely focused on physical traits, but rather on determining the likelihood of hiring someone with a propensity for ハート, 心 problems, cancer, diabetes, and other dangerous diseases with a heavy genetic component. I'm not dismissing your example from your own life, I'm acknowledging it and stating that your propensity for obesity wouldn't be the central focus of any genetic test. I can't say I know a tremendous amount about the Netherlands, but I do happen to know that, no matter where a person is hired, if they become ill with diseases such as I have mentioned, you're lucky if they come back at all. And if they do, they will likely be hobbled によって the disease's toll on them. I'm not talking about a common cold here, after all. I think the loss または weakening of the employee is もっと見る important than a small amount of money contributed によって the government. And I do think that's a good reason. Companies want to know that their employees will be fully functional (and not dead) over the course of their employment. Your last point is confusing to me, since I've already mentioned in the scenario that it doesn't matter whether companies "get to do DNA tests." Whether they're allowed または not, if they see enough benefit in doing it, they will, especially when the technology advances to the point I'm talking about.
whiteflame55 posted 1年以上前
coriann said:
well, genetics only provides a small percentage of who the person is going to be, for example, there are plenty of psychopaths out there that never became cold blooded killers because they were raised right, または at least that's what i got according to the documentary, also, there is a woman with very high testosterone who is straight and married または whatever, however maybe in the future they might find out that most of us is the way it is because of genetics, または maybe not, no one knows what's going to happen in the future, but if it does happen, i suppose i'd feel the same way about it as i would with any kind of discrimination
select as best answer
posted 1年以上前 
*
Well, you're quite right about the way genetics defines us. I think we're all agreed that it plays a certain role in how we grow over time, even though many other aspects play an important part. The oddity that distinguishes this from other kinds of discrimination, though, is detection. Most forms of discrimination are, in one way または another, もっと見る visible. This is the kind of discrimination that can easily slip under the rug, the kind that wouldn't get much notice. It almost seems もっと見る insidious to me than any other we've had.
whiteflame55 posted 1年以上前
*
that's true it is hard to notice, that is if it ever becomes a type of discrimitation to begin with
coriann posted 1年以上前
next question »